Debate continues within the United Kingdom regarding its arms trade relationship with Israel. Last year, the British government announced the suspension of several dozen arms export licenses destined for Israel. This move followed mounting pressure and scrutiny over the nature of these exports in the context of regional conflicts. However, despite these suspensions, numerous critics and advocacy groups maintain that the measures implemented do not extend far enough. They argue that a more comprehensive halt to arms sales or a more stringent review process is required to align with international humanitarian law principles and address ongoing concerns. The calls for a complete embargo or more significant restrictions persist, highlighting the contentious nature of the UK’s defence exports and its foreign policy stance in the region. The government’s position is frequently challenged by parliamentary members and civil society organizations who advocate for a more robust approach to arms export controls.