The impressive contributions of Michelle Agyemang and Chloe Kelly from the substitutes’ bench have become a prominent talking point as England prepares for the Euro 2025 final. Both players have consistently provided game-changing moments, leading to widespread discussion on whether their impactful performances warrant a place in the starting lineup for Sunday’s decisive match.
The case for their inclusion from the kick-off rests primarily on their demonstrated ability to influence games decisively. Agyemang’s astute positioning and finishing, coupled with Kelly’s explosive pace and direct attacking play, have frequently turned the tide in England’s favour. Starting them could provide an immediate boost in intensity and an early offensive threat, potentially disrupting the opposition’s defensive plans and seizing momentum from the outset. Their current form and confidence suggest they could be key figures in unlocking a strong opponent from the first whistle, offering a fresh dynamic to England’s attacking setup.
However, a strong argument exists for maintaining their current roles as impactful substitutes. The established rhythm of England’s starting eleven has proven highly effective throughout the tournament, with Agyemang and Kelly often introduced when opposing defenses are beginning to tire. This strategic deployment allows them to exploit spaces with fresh legs and deliver high-energy performances at crucial moments, often leading to decisive goals or game-winning plays. Altering a successful formula for such a high-stakes encounter carries inherent risks, potentially disrupting team cohesion or diminishing the late-game advantage their introduction provides. The coaching staff must weigh the desire to reward individual brilliance against the proven tactical effectiveness of their current roles.
